FUDforum - خوراک RDF
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.php
A bunch of patches
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.phpindex.php?t=rview&goto=166881&th=120376#msg_166881
If there are no objections I would do a "git format-patch" and attach the packet here. This would give one patch-file per commit, including my commit message. Those patch are not patch(1) compatible I fear, but they could be applied to any source tree with "git apply" (no need for it to be a git-repo, you just need to have git installed).
]]>macrule2012-03-17T14:56:05-00:00Re: A bunch of patches
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.phpindex.php?t=rview&goto=166882&th=120376#msg_166882
Unfortunately we're still on SVN. Anyway, the first step would be to upload your patches here, preferably in unidiff, but if you cannot, in any other readable format. If the patches are of high quality, we will apply them or alternatively arrange you SVN access (if you want to do it yourself).
We can also discuss a future GIT migration. However, the current priority is just to get FUDforum 3.0.4RC1 out.
Best regards.
Frank
]]>naudefj2012-03-18T03:35:17-00:00Aw: Re: A bunch of patches
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.phpindex.php?t=rview&goto=166883&th=120376#msg_166883
I didn't mean to push for a git move - I just came to find it very handy, especially as a local frontend to SVN repositories.
I haven't really worked with git-generated diff's with patch(1) before, but in a short test they seem to work with "patch -p1 < patchfile". So I have just attached them as they are, and hope they work for you.
If there are questions about the why and how of some changes, feel free to ask.
Best regards,
Bernd
]]>macrule2012-03-18T07:59:10-00:00Re: Aw: Re: A bunch of patches
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.phpindex.php?t=rview&goto=167052&th=120376#msg_167052
0001-Fixed-bad-destination-URL-after-submitting-a-poll-in.patch
Unable to reproduce problem - voting works 100% with PATH_INFO.
0015-Added-automtic-sequence-resetting-for-PostgreSQL-to-.patch
Rather use reset_fud_sequences() in dbadmin.inc.
Besides PostgreSQL, we also need to be able to fix sequences for DB2, Firebird and Oracle.
0016-Changed-BBCode-to-use-span-s-with-style-attribute-fo.patch
To be evaluated.
0017-Added-a-strike-BBCode-tag-for-strikethrough.patch
We already have a similar [del] and [s]tags. Do we need to add [strike] as well?
Maybe not (see http://xahlee.org/js/html_s_strike_del_html5.html): The <strike> is not supported in HTML5. The difference between "s" and "del" is that "del" carries a semantic meaning of deleted text. Both are rendered the same.
Converter was updated to change all [strike] to [del] tags.