FUDforum - خوراک RDF
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.php
Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.phpindex.php?t=rview&goto=178000&th=122656#msg_178000
> .oO(Jerry Stuckle)
>
>> On 5/8/2012 4:25 PM, Michael Fesser wrote:
>>> .oO(Jerry Stuckle)
>>>
>>>> On 5/7/2012 11:37 PM, Daniel Pitts wrote:
>>>> > Exactly true, but if you scale to sizes you don't need, you indeed use
>>>> > more processor time! Our disk space is definitely not the bottleneck.
>>>>
>>>> And if you repeatedly rescale the same image to the same size, you're
>>>> using even more processor time!
>>>
>>> You missed the word 'caching'. You rescale when needed, and only once.
>>
>> No, I didn't. By definition, caching is temporary storage which can be
>> erased at any time.
>
> Correct. And then the rescaled images are created again when needed, so
> what's the problem? It all happens automatically.
>
> Micha
>
Repeatedly resizing the files is a huge waste of processor resources.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp. jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================]]>Jerry Stuckle2012-05-10T03:53:13-00:00Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.phpindex.php?t=rview&goto=178001&th=122656#msg_178001
> Repeatedly resizing the files is a huge waste of processor resources.
Maybe you should get a decent machine? And "when needed" is not the same
as "repeatedly". It's done _once_ and may only be repeated if someone
would clear the image cache.