Ilia wrote on Tue, 16 December 2003 18:14 |
Equally important is "why?" afaik the CSS table are not rendered any faster then regular tables and I don't see the advantage of entirely CSS based design. Unfortunately the URL you've provided while certainly shows some very interesting examples does not go into the "why" either. |
Quote: |
Once its done for a sample stylesheet, it'll be easy for the majority of changes to be made. |
Quote: |
That csszengarden site is modified by graphic designers - not developers! If they can do it.... |
Quote: |
4. True. This, perhaps is the best argument against migration. However, it may be possible to make a start with parts of FUDforum, putting more styles into the current stylesheet as you go. Step by step, we get where we're going, after all. |
gbjbaanb wrote on Wed, 17 December 2003 17:57 |
BTW. someone mentioned XHTML. 'Rewriting' FUD to be XHTML compliant is quite easy (though dull). Check out http://www.w3schools.com/xhtml/xhtml_howto.asp and the what-is XHTML tutorial http://www.w3schools.com/xhtml/xhtml_intro.asp |
Ilia wrote on Wed, 17 December 2003 19:04 |
As for CSS I'd still recommend converting just 1 page (front page for example) of the forum and seeing what are the advantages and downfalls. Don't even try to convert the templates, just take the HTML output and convert that. Once we have a working prototype for a single page better conclusions can be drawn. |
Ilia wrote on Tue, 16 December 2003 16:14 |
Equally important is "why?" afaik the CSS table are not rendered any faster then regular tables and I don't see the advantage of entirely CSS based design. |
Ilia wrote on Tue, 19 October 2004 08:57 |
All layout is already done with CSS |
Quote: | ||||
However, I just read this thread. We went from
... to ...
|
D9rr wrote on Thu, 28 October 2004 16:28 |
There's at least one forum that's converting to a table-less layout: PunBB version 1.2. Once it comes out it might be worth taking a look at it for ideas. |