FUDforum - خوراک RDF
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.php
running both versions - php 4.3.0 and php 5 on one Apache-Server on Windows
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.phpindex.php?t=rview&goto=17463&th=3626#msg_17463
But I will now testing some things with the new one version: php 5.
How can I run the both versions of php on the same Apache 2.0 Server on Windows?
Is this posible?
Thanks and regards!
Nikolay]]>ZloBy2004-03-31T07:49:32-00:00Re: running both versions - php 4.3.0 and php 5 on one Apache-Server on Windows
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.phpindex.php?t=rview&goto=17466&th=3626#msg_17466
Ilia2004-03-31T13:44:18-00:00Re: running both versions - php 4.3.0 and php 5 on one Apache-Server on Windows
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.phpindex.php?t=rview&goto=18119&th=3626#msg_18119
esm20022004-05-10T06:38:56-00:00Re: running both versions - php 4.3.0 and php 5 on one Apache-Server on Windows
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.phpindex.php?t=rview&goto=18123&th=3626#msg_18123
Ilia2004-05-10T12:52:20-00:00Re: running both versions - php 4.3.0 and php 5 on one Apache-Server on Windows
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.phpindex.php?t=rview&goto=18132&th=3626#msg_18132
what do I need to be aware of as far as potential problems??
if the apache version is faster why go to the cgi version??]]>esm20022004-05-10T21:05:52-00:00Re: running both versions - php 4.3.0 and php 5 on one Apache-Server on Windows
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.phpindex.php?t=rview&goto=18134&th=3626#msg_18134
.]]>Ilia2004-05-10T21:27:52-00:00Re: running both versions - php 4.3.0 and php 5 on one Apache-Server on Windows
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.phpindex.php?t=rview&goto=18215&th=3626#msg_18215
http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/26890]]>philip2004-05-13T16:54:11-00:00Re: running both versions - php 4.3.0 and php 5 on one Apache-Server on Windows
http://fudforum.org/forum/index.phpindex.php?t=rview&goto=31411&th=3626#msg_31411
If the CGI binary and the HTTP children can all fit into RAM cache, then the hard drive doesn't get hit on every page load.
Once your CGI gets page-faulted to hard drive though, on a busy server, things go bad really fast.
[Or so I understand it...]
I did not read all the articles from the FAQT link, but if none of them discuss the ProxyPass option of running 2 apache servers, but having one of them "front" for the other, so you can get PHP as module on the 2 pools, while keeping a common "face" to the world, then you need to search PHP-General for Rasmus Lerdorf's post about this.
As far as missing features in CGI, the biggie is HTTP Authentication, as I recall. Apache/PHP are unwilling to schlep your HTTP Auth user/pass through the CGI command, as it would be visible to anybody who can run "ps auxwwww" and catch it as it goes by. (This is from memory from years ago, mind you, so I could be "off" a bit...)
There are also some real esoteric functions/features you are unlikely to notice at all missing from CGI -- So esoteric I've forgotten what they are. Again, years old info, so maybe there's more now that gets lost going from Module to CGI.
For the average webhosted shared site, a change from Module to CGI probably won't impact you at all, except possibly the speed issue -- And your webhost is probably fairly confident on that one, or they'd not go this route.
]]>richardlynch2006-04-21T09:29:28-00:00