Quote: |
Subject: [ShelbyUSERS] =?iso-8859-1?q?Processing_Shelby_PO=92s_in_AP?= Reply-To: ShelbyUSERS@yahoogroups.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-email-ff Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="zFJvW24Dcz0JINr7vYFTA8FlasqtrBQVRuko3Tv" X-Spam-Status: No X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 63.247.91.82 Status: R --zFJvW24Dcz0JINr7vYFTA8FlasqtrBQVRuko3Tv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We have been gradually moving from manual PO's to Shelby PO's. Our business administrator loves approving the PO's into the system and tracking encumbrances. I thought our AP processor would appreciate the reduced data entry, but at this point the change has had some frustrations. Here's our current issue=85 |