|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: better design [message #188 is a reply to message #163] |
Wed, 23 January 2002 07:49   |
Ecxeleron
Messages: 187
Registered: January 2002
Location: Australia
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Wow, now Fud is perfection, did i mention that Fud is perfection, oh I did. WOW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: better design [message #192 is a reply to message #188] |
Wed, 23 January 2002 15:04 |
Ilia
Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer |
|
|
| The Ecxeleron wrote on Wed, 23 January 2002 2:49 AM |
Wow, now Fud is perfection, did i mention that Fud is perfection, oh I did. WOW
|
Heh, I am not sure about perfection, but it does look better then it did before.
The reason, I've spent quite a bit of time yesterday tinkering with CSS to it looks the same in Mozilla (the browser I use myself) and IE 6.0. The problem was that IE did not inherit the properties of styles properly and didn't scale fonts as I wanted it to, so I've made a number of changes, which seems to have fixed that.
FUDforum Core Developer
|
|
|
|
| Re: better design [message #198 is a reply to message #163] |
Wed, 23 January 2002 18:09 |
Ilia
Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer |
|
|
I've applied a similar font format on our primary forum on mediaminer.org and many people have expressed the sentiment that the fonts may be a little to small.
Is the same sentiment shared here? If so, I'll increase the font sizes by 1 point.
FUDforum Core Developer
|
|
|
|
| Re: better design [message #201 is a reply to message #190] |
Thu, 24 January 2002 05:33 |
Ecxeleron
Messages: 187
Registered: January 2002
Location: Australia
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
| hackie wrote on Wed, 23 January 2002 7:29 PM |
| The Ecxeleron wrote on Wed, 23 January 2002 2:51 AM |
what OS doo u use?
|
What do you mean what OS? for what? personal computers? the server?
|
Personal computer
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: better design [message #235 is a reply to message #163] |
Mon, 28 January 2002 05:31 |
Ecxeleron
Messages: 187
Registered: January 2002
Location: Australia
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
well, IE is the standard. He instaled IE, and I made him a better design... seemes fair:)
|
|
|
|
| Re: better design [message #266 is a reply to message #235] |
Tue, 29 January 2002 05:10 |
hackie
Messages: 177
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member
Core Developer |
|
|
| The Ecxeleron wrote on Mon, 28 January 2002 12:31 AM |
well, IE is the standard. He instaled IE, and I made him a better design... seemes fair:)
|
Well, help is certainly appreciated, I do not agree! IE is most certainly *NOT* a standard. Mozilla is much closer to being a standard then IE. I.E. is an excellent browser indeed, it's not a standard. HTML4 is a standard, CSS, DOM are standards, IE is not. Therefor things shouldn't be designed for IE, but for those standards, and IE itself should be designed for them. heh.
Okie, [/rant off]
cc intelligence.c -o intelligence
$ ./intelligence
Segmentation fault
[Updated on: Tue, 29 January 2002 05:11] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: better design [message #289 is a reply to message #163] |
Wed, 30 January 2002 05:01 |
Ecxeleron
Messages: 187
Registered: January 2002
Location: Australia
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I agree, but IE is on 90% of computers, so it's the standard becuse it's used most.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: better design [message #291 is a reply to message #289] |
Wed, 30 January 2002 06:04 |
hackie
Messages: 177
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member
Core Developer |
|
|
| The Ecxeleron wrote on Wed, 30 January 2002 12:01 AM |
I agree, but IE is on 90% of computers, so it's the standard becuse it's used most.
|
heh.. as I said, I disagree, I can't allow one company to control the net, that would be stupid  .. and as I said, IE is NOT a standard... HTML/DOM/CSS are, and they should be followed not IE.. MS should be presured into supporting standards NOT the other way arround.
Did ya try latest mozilla? try it, you might like it over IE.. tabbed browsing rocks!
cc intelligence.c -o intelligence
$ ./intelligence
Segmentation fault
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: better design [message #337 is a reply to message #163] |
Tue, 05 February 2002 01:32 |
Ecxeleron
Messages: 187
Registered: January 2002
Location: Australia
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
You have to be carefull when writeing logic because human beings don't think in logic, and it can be dificult to emulate yourself sometimes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: better design [message #3227 is a reply to message #291] |
Fri, 14 June 2002 06:14 |
Ecxeleron
Messages: 187
Registered: January 2002
Location: Australia
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
| hackie wrote on Wed, 30 January 2002 16:34 |
| The Ecxeleron wrote on Wed, 30 January 2002 12:01 AM |
I agree, but IE is on 90% of computers, so it's the standard becuse it's used most.
|
heh.. as I said, I disagree, I can't allow one company to control the net, that would be stupid .. and as I said, IE is NOT a standard... HTML/DOM/CSS are, and they should be followed not IE.. MS should be presured into supporting standards NOT the other way arround.
Did ya try latest mozilla? try it, you might like it over IE.. tabbed browsing rocks!
|
Yes, but your tag was incorrect 
|
|
|
|
| Re: better design [message #3228 is a reply to message #291] |
Fri, 14 June 2002 06:22 |
Ecxeleron
Messages: 187
Registered: January 2002
Location: Australia
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
| hackie wrote on Wed, 30 January 2002 16:34 |
| The Ecxeleron wrote on Wed, 30 January 2002 12:01 AM |
I agree, but IE is on 90% of computers, so it's the standard becuse it's used most.
|
heh.. as I said, I disagree, I can't allow one company to control the net, that would be stupid .. and as I said, IE is NOT a standard... HTML/DOM/CSS are, and they should be followed not IE.. MS should be presured into supporting standards NOT the other way arround.
Did ya try latest mozilla? try it, you might like it over IE.. tabbed browsing rocks!
|
Just thought I'll dig up this thread, anywayz, You are right, Why let microsoft controll the net, It's mozilla from now on I'm downloading 1.1 alpha now
|
|
|
|
| Re: better design [message #3232 is a reply to message #3228] |
Fri, 14 June 2002 11:40 |
Olliver
Messages: 443
Registered: March 2002
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
In case u want to install the SUN java 2 package (latest version) Their installer for win32 is a bit stupid because it only recognizes Netscape 6.x and IE 5/6.x but not Mozilla. So u manually have to copy the appropriate plug-in from its installation location to ur plug-in folder. It's easier under *NIX because there u just have to set a symlink
Alternatively u could just stick to the older 1.31 version, which wouldn't have problems with recognizing Moz as a browser.
bye
Ken
[Updated on: Fri, 14 June 2002 11:41] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: better design [message #3275 is a reply to message #3272] |
Sat, 15 June 2002 16:38 |
Ilia
Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer |
|
|
Opera is indeed the fastest and the smallest browser around, for those perpouses no other browser can even come close. Mozilla in particular requires a fair bit of CPU to run fast since their layout is actually done in DHTML.
FUDforum Core Developer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
. 
). Apart from that it's quite ok. However it has the nasty habit of producing too much space between single list elements, which may spoil some boxes from time to time. Also the <td> tag may be sometimes spoiled on more complicated tables (wrong alignment, behavior similar to the ancient NS4 series). A workaround is using nested tables. It's a nice browser but I'll stick to Mozilla. 
]