FUDforum: Bug Reports » fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view?

Home » FUDforum Development » Bug Reports » fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? [message #167361 is a reply to message #167354]

Sun, 10 June 2012 07:42

naudefj

Messages: 3771
Registered: December 2004

Karma:

Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer

We probably need to enhance the install & upgrade scripts to read the MySQL syntax from sql/*.tpl files and transform it into q_bit*() syntax before execution.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: NeXuS on Sat, 26 May 2012 06:41
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: naudefj on Sat, 26 May 2012 08:03
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: NeXuS on Sat, 09 June 2012 10:03
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: naudefj on Sat, 09 June 2012 12:30
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: NeXuS on Sat, 09 June 2012 13:21
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: NeXuS on Sat, 09 June 2012 14:31
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: naudefj on Sun, 10 June 2012 07:42
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: NeXuS on Fri, 22 June 2012 07:31
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: NeXuS on Wed, 27 June 2012 00:40
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: naudefj on Wed, 27 June 2012 06:31
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: NeXuS on Wed, 27 June 2012 06:52

Previous Topic:	upgrade.php and q_bitand()
Next Topic:	Backup bug

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Mon Jul 01 19:13:28 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05500 seconds