FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.
Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » problem saving date fields
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: problem saving date fields [message #174118 is a reply to message #174112] Sun, 22 May 2011 13:11 Go to previous message
Twayne is currently offline  Twayne
Messages: 135
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
Senior Member
In news:7otgt6963n7tt7ns1of8ug7d5uf0ne641d(at)4ax(dot)com,
Jeff North <jnorthau(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)au> typed:
> On Sat, 21 May 2011 20:01:17 -0400, in comp.lang.php
> Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net>
> <ir9jom$663$1(at)dont-email(dot)me> wrote:
>
>>> On 5/21/2011 12:08 PM, Jeff North wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 21 May 2011 10:32:20 -0400, in comp.lang.php
>>>> Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net>
>>>> <ir8idn$ojm$1(at)dont-email(dot)me> wrote:
>>>>
>
> [snip]
>
>>>> There is no need to have variables in the code that
>>>> aren't being used.
>>>
>>> Yes, there is. In fact, it is quite common to have
>>> variables in the code which are not being use *at this
>>> time*. And very good reasons for *not* initializing
>>> them - as a *programmer* would know.
>
> Programmers who know more that just PHP know that you are
> full of crap.
>
> [snip]
>
>>>> >>> The SQL statement should be ok - it's the "When I
>>>> >>> change of them the other one gets set back to
>>>> >>> default: 00-00-0000" I'm considering.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> The SQL statement is NOT ok. As he would find if he
>>>> >> printed it out as was suggested.
>>>>
>>>> If the SQL statement was not ok then the record
>>>> wouldn't be updated.
>>>
>>> Or the row (tables have ROWS, not RECORDS) is not being
>>> updated with the correct data - which is the case here.
>>> But then a *programmer* would understand that.
>
> A row, or record, would NOT be updated if the SQL
> statement is NOT ok - even a moron like you can
> understand that - oh you do that is why you chose to
> answer the question the way you did.
>
>>>> >>>> | BTW - your sig separator is broken. It needs
>>>> >>>> to be exactly | hyphen-hyphen-space-newline.
>
> [snip]
>
>>>> >> It has nothing to do with Thunderbird. It has
>>>> >> EVERYTHING to do with following usenet standards, in
>>>> >> this case RFC 3736.
>>>>
>>>> Please highlight the line(s) from RFC 3736 that can
>>>> back up your claim.
>>>>
>>>> >> But I see you're as clueless about rfcs as you are
>>>> >> programming.
>>>> -- -------------------------------------------------
>>>> The supplied code is for guideline purposes only.
>>>
>>> Typo - the rfc is 3676,
>
> 3676 and 3736 is NOT a typo not matter how you try to
> spin it. If you are going to speak with the voice of
> authority then get your facts correct first.
>
>>> which you could find if you knew how to do a
>>> simple google search.
>
> Everyone would know that they needed to search for "The
> Text/Plain Format and DelSp Parameters" to get to the
> relevant information that you got wrong in the first
> place - right?
>
>>> But that looks to be beyond your capability, also.
>
> http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3676.html#sec-4.3
> "There is a long-standing convention in Usenet news which
> also commonly appears in Internet mail of using "-- " as
> the separator line between the body and the signature of
> a message. When generating a Format=Flowed message
> containing a Usenet-style separator before the signature,
> the separator line is sent as-is."
>
> Now where does it state "It needs to be exactly
> hyphen-hyphen-space-newline."
>
> [snip]
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> "Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> I said I was aiming at your stupidity, not your brain.
>
> "Johnny" <wxpprofessional(at)msn(dot)com> writes:
> You missed. You can not hit a non-existent thing.
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------

I can't tell you which of the netiquette/protocol RFCs contains the
dash-dash-space conventon, but it is included in one of them. For instance,
neither of the two sig delimiters above has the requisite space after it, so
it was not removed in this reply.
Otherwise I agree with you.

HTH,

Twayne`

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: is dis da place?
Next Topic: foreach in reverse
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Sat Nov 23 01:44:36 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04984 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.1.3.
Copyright ©2001-2023 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software