| Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android [message #181169 is a reply to message #181163] |
Fri, 19 April 2013 21:58   |
Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 4/19/2013 4:22 PM, Arno Welzel wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle, 2013-04-19 22:06:
>
>> On 4/19/2013 4:02 PM, Arno Welzel wrote:
>>> Arno Welzel, 2013-04-19 22:00:
>>>
>>>> Jerry Stuckle, 2013-04-19 18:44:
>>>>
>>>> > On 4/19/2013 11:14 AM, Arno Welzel wrote:
>>>> >> Am 19.04.2013 14:09, schrieb Jerry Stuckle:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> On 4/19/2013 3:30 AM, Arno Welzel wrote:
>>>> >>>> Jerry Stuckle, 2013-04-15 04:05:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>> On 4/14/2013 10:33 AM, Luuk wrote:
>>>> >>>>>> On 14-04-2013 14:48, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>> On 4/14/2013 3:46 AM, 23alagmy wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>>> Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> http://iamaspammer.com
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> What does this have to do with PHP, SPAMMER?
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> WHY is this message to comp.lang.php, comlaining that someone is
>>>> >>>>>> spamming here? The sender of this spammed message probably will not read
>>>> >>>>>> it anywayz........
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Maybe, maybe not.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> But ignoring SPAM does not make it go away.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> *Nothing* makes spam go away except filtering it.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Your proof?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Nothing will keep spammers from trying to send their stuff.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> So filtering (or better rejecting) spam is the only reasonable solution
>>>> >> to avoid it.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> What's your proof, that spammers will stop, just because you tell them
>>>> >> you don't want their spam? How many spammers could you convince to stop
>>>> >> it by responding to their spam?
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > Your proof?
>>>>
>>>> Spam exists.
>>>>
>>>> > You made the claim that nothing will stop the spammers. The only claim
>>>> > I made was that ignoring it will not stop the spammers.
>>>>
>>>> So what?
>>>>
>>>> > So what's your proof?
>>>> >
>>>> > And yes, I have gotten spammers websites and email accounts terminated.
>>>> > Plus, if you've paid ANY attention, some spammers come back here and
>>>> > apologize for spamming.
>>>>
>>>> Then those people where not spammers - otherwise the would have apologized.
>>>
>>> Sorry - sent to early and typing to fast...
>>>
>>> So those people where not spammers - otherwise they would not have
>>> apologized since spammers *never* apologize to send spam.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Maybe *YOU* don't apologize for sending SPAM. Some people do, when they
>> realize it IS spam.
>
> Then they are not spammers. They are just people who did a mistake.
>
According to YOUR definition. Most of the rest of the world does NOT
agree with you.
>> A spammer is a person who sends spam - not some subset like you want to
>> make them. When the error of their ways is pointed out, some people
>> correct those errors.
>
> No - a "spammer" is a person who sends spam and does not care about the
> negative effects.
>
>> But then you have a VERY narrow view of who spammers are. One which is
>> NOT shared by most of the world.
>
> The opposite is true - otherwise everybody would kindly ask every
> spammer to stop their business instead of using tools like
> SpamAssassing, greylisting, blacklisting etc.
>
>
>
No, YOU'RE the one with the VERY narrow view of who spammers are.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================
|
|
|
|
Calendar
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
]