| Re: Immediate Position:::Business Analyst With BI EXP::::At Houston, TX [message #181442] |
Thu, 16 May 2013 15:21  |
Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598
Registered: September 2010
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 5/16/2013 10:58 AM, susheel kumar wrote:
<spam>
I don't respond to spammers - especially ones who use a gmail address.
If you were a real recruiter, you would:
Have a domain name
Have a web site
List jobs on that web site
Use your own domain in your email address
Not spam Usenet
The only conclusion that comes to mind is you are a scammer and very
possibly an identity thief looking for a way to get private information.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OT: answering spammers (was: Re: Immediate Position:::Business Analyst With BI EXP::::At Houston, TX) [message #181455 is a reply to message #181442] |
Fri, 17 May 2013 13:46  |
Arno Welzel
Messages: 317
Registered: October 2011
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Am 16.05.2013 17:21, schrieb Jerry Stuckle:
> On 5/16/2013 10:58 AM, susheel kumar wrote:
> <spam>
>
> I don't respond to spammers - especially ones who use a gmail address.
Yes, you do. Or is this what you wrote here not a "respond"? How do you
describe this? "Just couldn't resist hacking my keyboard and by accident
a posting occured"? ;-)
> If you were a real recruiter, you would:
[...]
And if you were really concerned about the negative side effects of spam
in newsgroups, you would just ignore it. Do you really think, your
comments will change *anything*?
BTW: Without your reply I wouldn't even have noticed that a spammer
tried to post something to comp.lang.php - his posting was not delivered
to individual.de - maybe they have a working spam filter ;-)
F'up to poster, since this is already off topic here. Thanks for
respecting this.
--
Arno Welzel
http://arnowelzel.de
http://de-rec-fahrrad.de
|
|
|
|
| Re: Immediate Position:::Business Analyst With BI EXP::::At Houston, TX [message #181456 is a reply to message #181442] |
Fri, 17 May 2013 14:05 |
Evan Platt
Messages: 124
Registered: November 2010
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Thu, 16 May 2013 11:21:29 -0400, Jerry Stuckle
<jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net> wrote:
> On 5/16/2013 10:58 AM, susheel kumar wrote:
> <spam>
>
> I don't respond to spammers - especially ones who use a gmail address.
>
> If you were a real recruiter, you would:
>
> Have a domain name
The spammer does.
> Have a web site
The spammer does.
> List jobs on that web site
It does.
> Use your own domain in your email address
> Not spam Usenet
I agree with the rest.
--
To reply via e-mail, remove The Obvious and .invalid from my e-mail address.
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: answering spammers [message #181457 is a reply to message #181455] |
Fri, 17 May 2013 15:03 |
Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598
Registered: September 2010
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 5/17/2013 9:46 AM, Arno Welzel wrote:
> Am 16.05.2013 17:21, schrieb Jerry Stuckle:
>
>> On 5/16/2013 10:58 AM, susheel kumar wrote:
>> <spam>
>>
>> I don't respond to spammers - especially ones who use a gmail address.
>
> Yes, you do. Or is this what you wrote here not a "respond"? How do you
> describe this? "Just couldn't resist hacking my keyboard and by accident
> a posting occured"? ;-)
>
Calling them out is not responding to them. But then trolls don't know
the difference.
>> If you were a real recruiter, you would:
> [...]
>
> And if you were really concerned about the negative side effects of spam
> in newsgroups, you would just ignore it. Do you really think, your
> comments will change *anything*?
>
> BTW: Without your reply I wouldn't even have noticed that a spammer
> tried to post something to comp.lang.php - his posting was not delivered
> to individual.de - maybe they have a working spam filter ;-)
>
> F'up to poster, since this is already off topic here. Thanks for
> respecting this.
>
I really don't care if you saw the message or not. But I do know that
ignoring something does NOT make it go away. But then neither spammers
nor trolls like to be called out.
Why are you defending the spammers?
And fup changed back to the newsgroup. I'm not ashamed of my answers
and will not carry on a private conversation with a troll.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: answering spammers [message #181465 is a reply to message #181462] |
Sat, 18 May 2013 12:19 |
Scott Johnson
Messages: 196
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 5/17/2013 4:45 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> Almost, but one correction:
>
> \|||/
> (o o)
> ,~~~ooO~~(_)~~~~~~~~~,
> | Please |
> | don't feed ARNO |
> | THE TROLL! |
> '~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ooO~~~'
> |__|__|
> || ||
> ooO Ooo
>
Yall stop talking about feeding. Your making me hungry.
Scotty
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: answering spammers [message #181526 is a reply to message #181462] |
Mon, 20 May 2013 06:43 |
Arno Welzel
Messages: 317
Registered: October 2011
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Jerry Stuckle, 2013-05-18 01:45:
> Almost, but one correction:
>
> \|||/
> (o o)
> ,~~~ooO~~(_)~~~~~~~~~,
> | Please |
> | don't feed ARNO |
> | THE TROLL! |
> '~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ooO~~~'
> |__|__|
> || ||
> ooO Ooo
qed
|
|
|
|
Calendar
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
]