Playlist different from displayed list in source html code [message #185781] |
Fri, 09 May 2014 03:59  |
Mr Oldies
Messages: 241 Registered: October 2013
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
http://mroldies.net/radio/radio1.php
View page source and you will see the listed songs in the code do not match
the listed songs in the playlist. Why?
The songs in the playlist are called as named just fine.
Assume $number=40 for reference.
$x=0;
while ($x<$number){
$tune=substr($master[$x],0,6);
echo $tune;
$query = "SELECT * FROM picker where songID='$tune'";
if ($result = $mysqli->query($query)) {
/* fetch object array */
while ($row = $result->fetch_assoc()) {
// echo $row["songID"],$row["title"],$row["artist"];
// echo "<br>";
$y=substr($tune,0,2);
$year="19$y";
echo "<li class='aplay'>";
echo $row["songID"];
$song=$row['songID'].".mp3";
echo "<a href='#' data-src='http://mroldies.net/audio/$year/$song'>";
$xx=$x+1;
echo $xx.")....".$row["title"]."<br>".$row["artist"]." - ".$year;
echo "</a>";
echo "</li>";
echo "\n";
}
/* free result set */
$result->close();
}
$x++;
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Playlist different from displayed list in source html code [message #185793 is a reply to message #185783] |
Fri, 09 May 2014 15:35   |
Thomas 'PointedEars'
Messages: 701 Registered: October 2010
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
[F'up2 comp.lang.php]
Denis McMahon wrote:
> On Thu, 08 May 2014 21:51:55 -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
>> Please no one help bullis, otherwise he'll never learn.
>
> I defy anyone to decipher what his problem is this time. I didn't
> understand the question he was asking.
I also have found no obvious problem with the playlist. And while I commend
the effort, I must emphasize again that, the PHP code aside, in general you
must not do this (unless you are prepared to face legal notice and/or
litigation):
Musical works such as those presented on this Web site are intellectual
property which is subject to copyright laws. In the United States of
America, intellectual property published before 1978 CE enters the Public
Domain only “95 years from publication for works published 1964–1977; 28 (if
copyright not renewed) or 95 years from publication for works published
1923–1963.” [1]
The “Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works”,
which the United States signed in 1988, and the U.S. Senate ratified in
1989, must be considered for works created outside the United States. [2]
For example, the copyright for “Hey Jude” (1968) by “The Beatles” will not
expire in the U.S. before 2063, and as the song was produced and published
first in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, per the
Berne Convention its copyright will most certainly not expire before 70
years after the last previous member of “The Beatles” died. Last I checked,
Paul McCartney who co-wrote the song and was the lead vocalist, and Ringo
Starr who played the drums, were very much alive.
PointedEars, IANAL
___________
[1] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_law_of_the_United_States>
[2]
< https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_Convention_for_the_Protection_of_Litera ry_and_Artistic_Works>
--
realism: HTML 4.01 Strict
evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict
madness: XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml
-- Bjoern Hoehrmann
|
|
|
Re: Playlist different from displayed list in source html code [message #185794 is a reply to message #185793] |
Fri, 09 May 2014 16:24   |
Mr Oldies
Messages: 241 Registered: October 2013
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Fri, 09 May 2014 17:35:38 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> [F'up2 comp.lang.php]
>
> Denis McMahon wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 08 May 2014 21:51:55 -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
>>> Please no one help bullis, otherwise he'll never learn.
>>
>> I defy anyone to decipher what his problem is this time. I didn't
>> understand the question he was asking.
>
> I also have found no obvious problem with the playlist. And while I commend
> the effort, I must emphasize again that, the PHP code aside, in general you
> must not do this (unless you are prepared to face legal notice and/or
> litigation):
>
> Musical works such as those presented on this Web site are intellectual
> property which is subject to copyright laws. In the United States of
> America, intellectual property published before 1978 CE enters the Public
> Domain only “95 years from publication for works published 1964–1977; 28 (if
> copyright not renewed) or 95 years from publication for works published
> 1923–1963.” [1]
>
> The “Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works”,
> which the United States signed in 1988, and the U.S. Senate ratified in
> 1989, must be considered for works created outside the United States. [2]
> For example, the copyright for “Hey Jude” (1968) by “The Beatles” will not
> expire in the U.S. before 2063, and as the song was produced and published
> first in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, per the
> Berne Convention its copyright will most certainly not expire before 70
> years after the last previous member of “The Beatles” died. Last I checked,
> Paul McCartney who co-wrote the song and was the lead vocalist, and Ringo
> Starr who played the drums, were very much alive.
>
Oh I see we have yet another Benjamin Matlock attorney at law in the
group(s).
FYI, asswipe, I pay for the legal right to be a licensed broadcaster from
both BMI and ASCAP.
As for your quote about the "Beatles", obviously out of date.
Michael Jackson purchase ALL the rights to the Beatles songs from the
Beatles. After his death, Sony acquired those rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Playlist different from displayed list in source html code [message #185799 is a reply to message #185796] |
Fri, 09 May 2014 17:08   |
Doug Miller
Messages: 171 Registered: August 2011
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
richard <noreply(at)example(dot)com> wrote in news:15j31gpq9fmh3$.um1f43oo3g7g$.dlg@
40tude.net:
> On 9 May 2014 15:18:08 GMT, Erick T. Barkhuis wrote:
>
>> Denis McMahon:
>>
>>> On Thu, 08 May 2014 21:51:55 -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please no one help bullis, otherwise he'll never learn.
>>>
>>> I defy anyone to decipher what his problem is this time. I didn't
>>> understand the question he was asking.
>>
>> Neither do I, and I admit having had a look at this website.
>> Richard wrote:
>>> http://mroldies.net/radio/radio1.php
>>> View page source and you will see the listed songs in the code do not
>>> match the listed songs in the playlist. Why?
>>
>> I really have no clue what parts should have matched (and don't match).
>> As far as I'm concerned, I see no non-matching listed songs.
>>
>> All I see is (quoted just a part of the bunch):
>>
>> 68-0960...68-096I Say A Little PrayerAretha Franklin<li
>> class='aplay'>68-096<a href='#'
>> data-src='http://mroldies.net/audio/1968/68-096.mp3'>1)....I Say A
>> Little Prayer<br>Aretha Franklin - 1968</a></li>
>>
>> 61-1071...61-107Moon RiverJerry Butler<li class='aplay'>61-107<a
>> href='#'
>> data-src='http://mroldies.net/audio/1961/61-107.mp3'>2)....Moon
>> River<br>Jerry Butler - 1961</a></li>
>>
>> 69-1842...69-184I'll Try Something NewDiana Ross and the Supremes<li
>> class='aplay'>69-184<a href='#'
>> data-src='http://mroldies.net/audio/1969/69-184.mp3'>3)....I'll Try
>> Something New<br>Diana Ross and the Supremes - 1969</a></li>
>>
>> [...etc...]
>
> Well you did half of what you should have.
There you go again.
He doesn't *have* to do *anything*, idiot.
> My question is, why does the html code show different than what is
> displayed on the page?
Because you don't understand what you're doing, and screwed up again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Playlist different from displayed list in source html code [message #185803 is a reply to message #185796] |
Fri, 09 May 2014 17:44   |
Jrgen Exner
Messages: 14 Registered: March 2013
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
On Fri, 9 May 2014 12:36:47 -0400, richard <noreply(at)example(dot)com> wrote
in comp.databases.mysql:
> On 9 May 2014 15:18:08 GMT, Erick T. Barkhuis wrote:
>> Neither do I, and I admit having had a look at this website.
>> Richard wrote:
>>> http://mroldies.net/radio/radio1.php
>>> View page source and you will see the listed songs in the code do not
>>> match the listed songs in the playlist. Why?
>>
>> I really have no clue what parts should have matched (and don't match).
>> As far as I'm concerned, I see no non-matching listed songs.
>>
>> All I see is (quoted just a part of the bunch):
>> [...etc...]
>
> Well you did half of what you should have.
No, he did half of what _YOU_ should have done.
If you want help then it is customary to show the code, to explain the
expected behaviour, to explain the observed behaviour, to explain how it
is different from the expected behaviour, and what you have tried so far
to correct the situation.
You have explained maybe 1/2 of these 5 items.
> My question is, why does the html code show different than what is
> displayed on the page?
Let me try to understand this correctly.
You got some HTML code. Correct?
You expect this code to render as some text in the browser. Correct?
The actually rendered text is different from what you expect the
HTML-code to generate. Correct?
Then where on earth did you get the idea this could possibly have
anything to do with SQL? That's an HTML or maybe browser question that
only in an different universe could have any relation to SQL.
jue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Playlist different from displayed list in source html code [message #185807 is a reply to message #185794] |
Fri, 09 May 2014 18:51   |
Thomas 'PointedEars'
Messages: 701 Registered: October 2010
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
richard wrote:
> On Fri, 09 May 2014 17:35:38 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Denis McMahon wrote:
>>> On Thu, 08 May 2014 21:51:55 -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
>>>> Please no one help bullis, otherwise he'll never learn.
>>> I defy anyone to decipher what his problem is this time. I didn't
>>> understand the question he was asking.
>> I also have found no obvious problem with the playlist. And while I
>> commend the effort, I must emphasize again that, the PHP code aside, in
>> general you must not do this (unless you are prepared to face legal
>> notice and/or litigation):
>> […]
>
> Oh I see we have yet another Benjamin Matlock attorney at law in the
> group(s).
No, I have explicitly stated that “I Am Not A Lawyer” by adding “IANAL” to
my posting.
> FYI, asswipe, I pay for the legal right to be a licensed broadcaster from
> both BMI and ASCAP.
Good for you. However, despite my predilection for that kind of music as
well, as listener and musician, you have just now forfeited my further
support for your project due of your ongoing uncivilized behavior. You
really should learn to realize when people are trying to help you, lest you
lose the support of other people, too.
> As for your quote about the "Beatles", obviously out of date.
> Michael Jackson purchase ALL the rights to the Beatles songs from the
> Beatles. After his death, Sony acquired those rights.
Fascinating.
PointedEars
--
Sometimes, what you learn is wrong. If those wrong ideas are close to the
root of the knowledge tree you build on a particular subject, pruning the
bad branches can sometimes cause the whole tree to collapse.
-- Mike Duffy in cljs, <news:Xns9FB6521286DB8invalidcom(at)94(dot)75(dot)214(dot)39>
|
|
|
Re: Playlist different from displayed list in source html code [message #185808 is a reply to message #185795] |
Fri, 09 May 2014 20:49   |
Evan Platt
Messages: 124 Registered: November 2010
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Fri, 9 May 2014 12:34:52 -0400, richard <noreply(at)example(dot)com>
wrote:
> Showing us all once again YOU are the master of harassment.
Showing once again you're a troll. And a bad one at that.
> Where is your functional working website Evan?
Hosted on my webserver.
> Why are you so ashamed to post the URL?
Because of fucktards like you. I made the mistake of posting where I
worked, and you e-mail my employer who laughs at your dumb ass.
I made the mistake of putting some photos public, you go and assume
the kids in the photos are my kids, and god knows what you did with
those photos, knowing your feelings towards children.
So, because of psychopathic fucktards like you, my domain is private.
> What php or mysqli code have you EVER written?
Lots. Your code apparently is all stolen, and you try to get it to
work for your purpose, and when you fail, you come crying here for
help.
> You got your ass booted from a job because you spent most of your time
> online harrassing people at company expense.
*sigh* here we go again. What's the longest you've lasted at a job,
bullis? Because whenever anyone talks about a job, you seemed to have
done it. Pumped gas. Security Guard. Cab driver. Trucker. I'm probably
missing a dozen. Me? I've been in IT since my first job in 1994. And
each company, I've been with for 5 years. Do you have that track
record?
I left Pronto because they closed their office. Their US office no
longer exists. Now get that through your thick skull so I don't have
to repeat that again in another week.
Oh and speaking of failures, how is your dome home coming? Have you
even started it?
<Crickets>
--
To reply via e-mail, remove The Obvious and .invalid from my e-mail address.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Playlist different from displayed list in source html code [message #185815 is a reply to message #185811] |
Sat, 10 May 2014 13:35   |
Mr Oldies
Messages: 241 Registered: October 2013
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Fri, 09 May 2014 18:28:20 -0400, Lew Pitcher wrote:
> On Friday 09 May 2014 17:44, in comp.databases.mysql, "Tim Streater"
> <timstreater(at)greenbee(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> In article <iifqm9d0mfqt4g0t3vk8nt73474jc7k2l4(at)4ax(dot)com>, Evan Platt
>> <evan(at)theobvious(dot)espphotography(dot)com(dot)invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> <Crickets>
>>
>> What does this mean?
>
> http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ChirpingCrickets
Not really.
As Evann uses it, he is generally banking on the fact that I won't respond
to his bullshit.
As applied in usenet, it generally means that when there are no other
sounds around, a cricket can be heard. Even though the poster is expecting
a reply, he feels that there won't be one.
As a general rule, I don't reply to a reply of a post of mine when that
reply is buried six deep and the thread has been conviluted greatly.
As in when Evan brings up his non-sequitor totally irrelevant bullshit.
Like when he mentions my desire to build a geodesic dome home.
He already knows the answer to that question but sitll has to egg it on.
|
|
|
Re: Playlist different from displayed list in source html code [message #185816 is a reply to message #185813] |
Sat, 10 May 2014 13:51   |
Mr Oldies
Messages: 241 Registered: October 2013
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Fri, 09 May 2014 16:44:15 -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
> On Fri, 09 May 2014 18:28:20 -0400, Lew Pitcher
> <lew(dot)pitcher(at)digitalfreehold(dot)ca> wrote:
>
>>>> <Crickets>
>>>
>>> What does this mean?
>>
>> http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ChirpingCrickets
>
> Yep.
>
> Bullis is a troll.
>
> He's infamous for issuing false challenges.
>
> bullis: "Evan, show me proof where it's documented that the
> Constitution was signed in Texas in 1932 like you said."
>
Post the link and I'll read it again so I know why I said it, if I did say
it.
Knowing you, you twist words.
> Me: "I made no such statement. Show me evidence of where I did."
>
> And bullis, whenever challenged, crawls back under his bridge, and
> won't respond, hence the sound of crickets.
Look up "Just Taylor" or "Taylor Jiminez".
He was an expert practitioner of "Twisting words" to suit his purpose.
The probnlem was, his followers backed him up with what ever he twisted.
In one post, I was speaking of the fact that I was in one of the first
groups of regular army personnel to be issued an M-16. When before that,
only special forces got them. He claimed I had said I was in special
forces. I never made that claim.
Like the time when I asked, where do people in Aftica go to ski on snow?
They go to Dubai! You now turn around and claim I said Dubai is in Aftica.
If I said, people in London England go to Switzerland to ski on snow, you'd
say Switzerland is now in England.
<crickets>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Playlist different from displayed list in source html code [message #185834 is a reply to message #185816] |
Sun, 11 May 2014 16:05   |
Evan Platt
Messages: 124 Registered: November 2010
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Sat, 10 May 2014 09:51:24 -0400, richard <noreply(at)example(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Fri, 09 May 2014 16:44:15 -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 18:28:20 -0400, Lew Pitcher
>> <lew(dot)pitcher(at)digitalfreehold(dot)ca> wrote:
>>
>>>> > <Crickets>
>>>>
>>>> What does this mean?
>>>
>>> http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ChirpingCrickets
>>
>> Yep.
>>
>> Bullis is a troll.
>>
>> He's infamous for issuing false challenges.
>>
>> bullis: "Evan, show me proof where it's documented that the
>> Constitution was signed in Texas in 1932 like you said."
>>
>
> Post the link and I'll read it again so I know why I said it, if I did say
> it.
> Knowing you, you twist words.
That was an example. But here's an actual one, and no, I don't expect
you have the balls to answer.
Path: not-for-mail
From: richard <noreply(at)example(dot)com>
Newsgroups: 24hoursupport.helpdesk
Subject: Evan Platt por favor
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:43:14 -0400
Organization: who
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <31o5d0fs5rm4$(dot)x0kbil8h1mvi(dot)dlg(at)40tude(dot)net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:
p217f84f467ad61ebb4d957bf463586dfb33b28f1bd4d7aaf.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-evan-platt: usenet stalker
X-Received-Bytes: 1451
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2754388163
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrument_flight_rules
You say I can't fly a plane without instruments?
Well this article obviously says I can.
As a matter of fact, can you point out the law where it says that an
airplane has to have instruments at all?
As an example, there is a type of aircraft known as an ultralight.
Some carry two people and those are required to be flown by licensed
pilots.
Now show me one of these aircraft that has all the instruments a
little
four seat Cessna might have.
===========================
Nowhere did I say you can't fly a plane without instruments, or did I
saw where a plane has to have instruments.
Point out where I did.
Your turn.
<crickets>
--
To reply via e-mail, remove The Obvious and .invalid from my e-mail address.
|
|
|
Re: Playlist different from displayed list in source html code [message #185941 is a reply to message #185834] |
Thu, 15 May 2014 05:16  |
Evan Platt
Messages: 124 Registered: November 2010
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Sun, 11 May 2014 09:05:14 -0700, Evan Platt
<evan(at)theobvious(dot)espphotography(dot)com(dot)invalid> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 May 2014 09:51:24 -0400, richard <noreply(at)example(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 16:44:15 -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 18:28:20 -0400, Lew Pitcher
>>> <lew(dot)pitcher(at)digitalfreehold(dot)ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> >> <Crickets>
>>>> >
>>>> > What does this mean?
>>>>
>>>> http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ChirpingCrickets
>>>
>>> Yep.
>>>
>>> Bullis is a troll.
>>>
>>> He's infamous for issuing false challenges.
>>>
>>> bullis: "Evan, show me proof where it's documented that the
>>> Constitution was signed in Texas in 1932 like you said."
>>>
>>
>> Post the link and I'll read it again so I know why I said it, if I did say
>> it.
>> Knowing you, you twist words.
>
> That was an example. But here's an actual one, and no, I don't expect
> you have the balls to answer.
>
> Path: not-for-mail
> From: richard <noreply(at)example(dot)com>
> Newsgroups: 24hoursupport.helpdesk
> Subject: Evan Platt por favor
> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:43:14 -0400
> Organization: who
> Lines: 18
> Message-ID: <31o5d0fs5rm4$(dot)x0kbil8h1mvi(dot)dlg(at)40tude(dot)net>
> NNTP-Posting-Host:
> p217f84f467ad61ebb4d957bf463586dfb33b28f1bd4d7aaf.newsdawg.com
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
> X-evan-platt: usenet stalker
> X-Received-Bytes: 1451
> X-Received-Body-CRC: 2754388163
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrument_flight_rules
>
> You say I can't fly a plane without instruments?
> Well this article obviously says I can.
> As a matter of fact, can you point out the law where it says that an
> airplane has to have instruments at all?
> As an example, there is a type of aircraft known as an ultralight.
> Some carry two people and those are required to be flown by licensed
> pilots.
> Now show me one of these aircraft that has all the instruments a
> little
> four seat Cessna might have.
> ===========================
> Nowhere did I say you can't fly a plane without instruments, or did I
> saw where a plane has to have instruments.
>
> Point out where I did.
>
> Your turn.
>
> <crickets>
Yep, no response from bullis. Didn't see that one coming.
--
To reply via e-mail, remove The Obvious and .invalid from my e-mail address.
|
|
|