FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » FUDforum Development » Bug Reports » second code tag ignored
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
second code tag ignored [message #5219] Fri, 23 August 2002 18:27 Go to next message
dtype is currently offline  dtype   United States
Messages: 11
Registered: August 2002
Karma: 0
Junior Member
On rc2 (and i don't see a report fixing it), the second code tag in a post is ignored). See http://alt.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=17.
Re: second code tag ignored [message #5220 is a reply to message #5219] Fri, 23 August 2002 18:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dtype is currently offline  dtype   United States
Messages: 11
Registered: August 2002
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Actually, it appears now that it might just be the code block in question. Still, is screwing up a regexp then. :)
Re: second code tag ignored [message #5221 is a reply to message #5219] Fri, 23 August 2002 18:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dtype is currently offline  dtype   United States
Messages: 11
Registered: August 2002
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Now it is narrowed down to an unclosed '[' which screws up the regexp.
Re: second code tag ignored [message #5222 is a reply to message #5221] Fri, 23 August 2002 18:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ilia is currently offline  Ilia   Canada
Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer
Uhm, if you embed a [code] tag inside another [code] tag of course it will not get parsed, hardly a bug. Any FUDcode inside the [code] tag will be skipped over.

FUDforum Core Developer
Re: second code tag ignored [message #5223 is a reply to message #5222] Fri, 23 August 2002 19:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dtype is currently offline  dtype   United States
Messages: 11
Registered: August 2002
Karma: 0
Junior Member
prottoss wrote on Fri, 23 August 2002 14:42

Uhm, if you embed a [code] tag inside another [code] tag of course it will not get parsed, hardly a bug. Any FUDcode inside the [code] tag will be skipped over.


If you put an unclosed `[` character inside of a code tag, it appears that the code tags will be ignored.

[code]

There are pieces of code which use this.
[

[/code]
Re: second code tag ignored [message #5224 is a reply to message #5223] Fri, 23 August 2002 19:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ilia is currently offline  Ilia   Canada
Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer
Oh, I see... that is a problem indeed...

I'll fix Smile


FUDforum Core Developer
Re: second code tag ignored [message #5227 is a reply to message #5224] Fri, 23 August 2002 21:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ilia is currently offline  Ilia   Canada
Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer
The bug has been fixes a CVS. A rather nasty bug, since it actually cause any tag to break if a non closed [ was found between [tagopen] and [/tagclose]

FUDforum Core Developer
Re: second code tag ignored [message #5234 is a reply to message #5227] Sat, 24 August 2002 05:26 Go to previous message
dtype is currently offline  dtype   United States
Messages: 11
Registered: August 2002
Karma: 0
Junior Member
prottoss wrote on Fri, 23 August 2002 17:20

The bug has been fixes a CVS. A rather nasty bug, since it actually cause any tag to break if a non closed [ was found between [tagopen] and [/tagclose]


Thanks. I just report em as my users see em. :)

See another instance of FUDforum at http://alt.org/forum/, which is a place for open source/free software development on TiVo.
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: when post!
Next Topic: Problem with persistant connections
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Sat Nov 23 13:10:55 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02106 seconds