FUDforum: Bug Reports » fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view?

Home » FUDforum Development » Bug Reports » fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view?

Sat, 09 June 2012 12:30

naudefj

Messages: 3771
Registered: December 2004

Karma:

Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer

Bitwise operations are not cross-database compatible.
You need to use q_bitand(), q_bitor() and q_bitnot().

		fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: NeXuS on Sat, 26 May 2012 06:41
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: naudefj on Sat, 26 May 2012 08:03
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: NeXuS on Sat, 09 June 2012 10:03
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: naudefj on Sat, 09 June 2012 12:30
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: NeXuS on Sat, 09 June 2012 13:21
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: NeXuS on Sat, 09 June 2012 14:31
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: naudefj on Sun, 10 June 2012 07:42
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: NeXuS on Fri, 22 June 2012 07:31
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: NeXuS on Wed, 27 June 2012 00:40
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: naudefj on Wed, 27 June 2012 06:31
		Re: fud30_group_cache table, shouldn't it be a view? By: NeXuS on Wed, 27 June 2012 06:52

Previous Topic:	upgrade.php and q_bitand()
Next Topic:	Backup bug

Goto Forum:

]

Current Time: Sat Jun 29 15:29:05 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05034 seconds