Re: Unable to connect to database server! [message #172111 is a reply to message #172109] |
Mon, 31 January 2011 00:01 |
Evan Platt
Messages: 124 Registered: November 2010
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:26:55 -0700, richard <member(at)newsguy(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:15:36 -0500, Sherm Pendley wrote:
>
>> Evan Platt <evan(at)theobvious(dot)espphotography(dot)com> writes:
>>
>>> On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:38:46 -0700, richard <member(at)newsguy(dot)com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Database_name is generally the same as the FTP account.
>>>
>>> WTF??
>>>
>>> Have you ever given correct information?
>>
>> No, he hasn't.
>>
>> He's not known as "Richard the Stupid" for nothing, ya know... :-)
>>
>> sherm--
>
> Excuse me gents, but I do have the experience to back up my claims.
No, you don't.
> When I need to set up a database,
"Set up a database?" lol
> which I have done,
Umm, no, you haven't.
> the first part of the database name is always the same as the ftp account.
And that has what to do with anything?
Just because YOU have done it, doesn't equate to your claim of
"Database_name is generally the same as the FTP account."
I fill up my car when it gets to a quarter tank. By your logic, I can
say "People generally fill up their car when it gets to a quarter
tank."?
> Assume the ftp account is named "hello".
"account"? Do you mean username?
> You want a db name of "world". The database name then becomes "hello_world".
> Another one might be like "hello_goodbye".
> That is how it is setup on my server.
You have a colo server. Running Windows, none the less, because you
can't handle anything without a pretty GUI.
> Then, I have to create a user and password for both.
> Not to mention a little fine tuning in the ODBC.
Quit trying to talk like you know what you're talking about. We all
know you don't.
--
To reply via e-mail, remove The Obvious and .invalid from my e-mail address.
|
|
|