Re: OT: new DateTimeZone and html encoding [message #172859 is a reply to message #172857] |
Sat, 05 March 2011 20:26 |
Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598 Registered: September 2010
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 3/5/2011 3:07 PM, BootNic wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:14:47 -0500 Jerry Stuckle
> <jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net> wrote:
>
>>> On Friday, March 4, 2011 11:28:32 AM UTC-5, Erwin Moller wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>>> 2) They respond without using the "References", and thus create
>>>> topthreads all the time, while they are actually responding to
>>>> an existing thread.
>
> [snip]
>
>>>> But please stop using Google Groups. If you must, I heard the
>>>> 'classic interface' (whatever that is) is less broken than their
>>>> latest greatest.
>
> [snip]
>
>> Erwin has a very valid point. Not keeping messages in the thread
>> completely screws up the continuity.
>
> [snip]
>
>> everyone else who reads your messages with a real newsreader sees
>> it.
>
> The newsreader I have chosen to use does not misplace the message.
>
> I would have never known that the References was missing or that it
> caused any issues if it were not pointed out in this thread.
>
> I suppose some newsreaders are better then others. Different
> strengths and weakness.
>
> [snip]
>
>
Which is really interesting, because there is no reference in the
message header.
So what you're saying is your news reader goes by the Subject: line?
That would be hell in the case you have multiple threads with the same
subject, as I've seen in many newsgroups. Talk about a mess!
But I guess you're right - some news readers are better than others.
Glad I'm using one of the ones which works correctly.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================
|
|
|