FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » How to convert this PHP into JavaScript
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: How to convert this PHP into JavaScript [message #173173 is a reply to message #173171] Fri, 25 March 2011 23:23 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
sheldonlg is currently offline  sheldonlg
Messages: 166
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
Senior Member
On 3/25/2011 5:01 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 3/25/2011 4:51 PM, Denis McMahon wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:22:42 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/25/2011 2:59 PM, sheldonlg wrote:
>>>> On 3/24/2011 12:50 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> > On 3/24/2011 10:23 AM, Oltmans wrote:
>>>> >> Hi PHP gurus, I hope you're doing well.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I'm trying to convert a PHP script into JavaScript. I'm posting here
>>>> >> because I don't know much PHP and I hope someone among you can help.
>>>> >> Here is the PHP
>>>> >>
>>>> >> array(
>>>> >> 'abc' => '1 AND (2 OR
>>>> >> 3)', // Define how to
>>>> >> use the following criteria
>>>> >> 'def' => array('marketing_campaign_id', 'status', 'status'), //
>>>> >> Filter by these three criteria 'ghi' => array('eq', 'eq',
>>>> >> 'eq')
>>>> >> );
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I need to convert above into JavaScript object which looks like
>>>> >>
>>>> >> {
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 'abc' : '1 AND (2 OR 3)'
>>>> >> }
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> but I don't know how to convert
>>>> >>
>>>> >> array('marketing_campaign_id', 'status', 'status')
>>>> >>
>>>> >> into equivalent JavaScript. Can someone please let me know how to
>>>> >> convert above into JavaScript? I will really appreciate your help in
>>>> >> this regard. Thanks!
>>>> >
>>>> > If you want to write javascript, you should ask in a javascript
>>>> > newsgroup.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> No Jerry, not this time. He has a PHP array and he wants to use that
>>>> PHP array to generate a script in javascript. That means that knowledge
>>>> of BOTH is required.
>>>>
>>>> This is more properly asked here in this PHP group than in the
>>>> Javascript group. Everyone here also knows at least SOME Javascript.
>>>> The reverse is not true for the Javascript group. People there may not
>>>> know ANY PHP (though most seem to).
>>>>
>>>>
>>> No, Sheldon, he needs to be in comp.lang.javascript - where some of the
>>> people there know PHP.
>>>
>>> The first thing he needs is the appropriate javascript he needs - i.e.
>>> hand coding it. The generating the appropriate javascript from the
>>> array is simple.
>>>
>>> Now, if he would have said "I have this javascript I need to generate
>>> from this PHP array...", I would agree this is more appropriate.
>>
>> It does depend on your viewpoint of what he's asking.
>>
>> My viewpoint is that he has a server side php application that generates
>> a (two dimensional associative) array in php, and that he subsequently
>> wants to use the data in that array client side with javascript running
>> in a website viewers browser.
>>
>> So, I see his problem as being "how do I pass the information contained
>> in this (two dimensional associative) array in my php script on the
>> server into the webpage that I am generating to send to the website
>> viewers client browser so that it can be used by scripts running in a
>> client side context on that web page?"
>>
>> My solution is to create a JSON string representation of his (two
>> dimensional associative) array, and put that string into the heredoc
>> output in a way that the javascript will create a javascript object that,
>> whilst not technically a (two dimensional associative) array, is similar
>> enough to one in structure that he can access the data elements of it in
>> a manner that correlates to the keys in the original php (two dimensional
>> associative) array.
>>
>> Doubtless there are other solutions, if his array always had the same
>> structure and format, he could write code to generate whatever javascript
>> representation of the array he wished[1], but the json approach means
>> that if the structure of his php generated array changes, the transfer of
>> that array into a javascript object is probably robust enough to not need
>> "tweaking", and the only changes he's likely to have to make to his
>> javascript will be how he uses the modified object, without having to
>> worry about restructuring the conversion from the php array to the
>> javascript object.
>>
>> Rgds
>>
>> Denis McMahon
>>
>
> <snip>
>
>
> Personally, I think a much easier solution would be to just generate the
> javascript in the page - no json overhead, no extra calls to the server
> or anything else.
>
> As for the structure of the PHP array changing - he'll have the same
> problem with his javascript either way - he'll have to change the PHP
> code creating the json data and/or the javascript to process it.
>
> But either way, he still needs to know what he wants for his javascript.
>

I just, two days ago, had a need to do just that. What I did was:

print "<script>\n";
print " var foo = new Array();\n";
print " foo[0] = " . $foo[0] . ";\n";
etc. (generating the array for javascript)
print " function myFunc(i) { \n";
print " ...... do stuff with the foo[i] ......\n";
print " }\n";
print "</script\n";

and then have the function myFunc called as needed later in the page.


--
Shelly
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: website developers requirements
Next Topic: Aste - PHP template engine
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Thu Nov 28 11:20:03 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03147 seconds