FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.
Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » error message I don understand
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Nasty language semantics (Was: error message I don understand) [message #174915 is a reply to message #174914] Sun, 17 July 2011 20:21 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
The Natural Philosoph is currently offline  The Natural Philosoph
Messages: 993
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
Senior Member
Robert Heller wrote:
> At Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:50:23 +0100 The Natural Philosopher <tnp(at)invalid(dot)invalid> wrote:
>
>> Tim Streater wrote:
>>> In article <ivv775$egh$1(at)dont-email(dot)me>,
>>> August Karlstrom <fusionfile(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2011-07-17 18:31, Peter H. Coffin wrote:
>>>> > On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 16:50:28 +0200, August Karlstrom wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> On 2011-07-17 15:03, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> This isn't mathematics - it is programming, as people have told you
>>>> >>> before. If you want mathematics, get a chalkboard.
>>>> >> Don't be silly. There are several programming languages in which `='
>>>> >> denote (surprise) equality.
>>>> > Very few that use it alone.
>>>> Pascal, Modula-2, Eiffel and Ada all use `=' for equality and `:=' for
>>>> assignment.
>>> A good enough reason not to use these languages.
>>>
>> The chief reason I gave up on Pascal after spending 4 hours trying to
>> make a variable length bitfield containing potentially different sorts
>> of entities depending on what was in the first few bits...into some form
>> of syntax that made it usable, was that in the end rewriting the whole
>> program in C was quicker than trying to make the existing Pascal work.
>>
>> And that's the problem with these academic languages. When you meet a
>> situation never envisaged in the academics brain that created them, you
>> are basically shafted.
>>
>> I don't care what the actual syntax is. AS long as its clear unambiguous
>> and consistent.
>>
>>
>> Since I write assignment more often than comparisons, I slightly prefer
>> a=b as the assignment and a==b as the boolean comparison.
>>
>> Aso why I hate loosely typed languages.
>>
>> I want to know that '1.02' + '3.7' is reliably going to be either '4.72'
>> or '1.023.7', not implementation dependent, as I found in at least one
>> Javascript example.
>
> Javascript's main problem here is using a common numerical operator (+)
> as a string operator as will AND allowing numbers to promoted (or
> demoted) to strings. Javascript *could* have picked a different
> operator for string concatenation, something less likely to cause
> ambigious interpretation.
>
Or they could have defined the language carefully enough so that it was
unambiguous, or allowed for explicit casting to make it so.


>>
>

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Ouion Movement, Roun Time (Floating Point Time)
Next Topic: [MEMCACHED] Is there a way to get the expiration of a key?
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Sat Nov 23 09:12:55 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04762 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.1.3.
Copyright ©2001-2023 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software