FUDforum: comp.lang.php » mktime 2-digit vs 4-digit year

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » mktime 2-digit vs 4-digit year

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: mktime 2-digit vs 4-digit year [message #175225 is a reply to message #175223]

Sat, 27 August 2011 18:05

BKDotCom
Messages: 7
Registered: October 2010

Karma:

Junior Member

Executive decision on my part.
If you pass 85 to my function it will be interpreted literally as year
85 (not 1985)
however, It'll also accept strings for the year. "85" will be
interpreted as 1985. In case someone needs that 2-digit
functionality.

What bonehead is using 2-digit years?! :)

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		mktime 2-digit vs 4-digit year By: BKDotCom on Fri, 26 August 2011 19:56
		Re: mktime 2-digit vs 4-digit year By: A on Fri, 26 August 2011 23:14
		Re: mktime 2-digit vs 4-digit year By: BKDotCom on Sat, 27 August 2011 14:54
		Re: mktime 2-digit vs 4-digit year By: BKDotCom on Sat, 27 August 2011 18:05
		Re: mktime 2-digit vs 4-digit year By: A on Sun, 28 August 2011 15:15

Previous Topic:	Top 10 Wrong Ideas About PHP
Next Topic:	fopen error

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 19 23:19:28 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04450 seconds