FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » Lilupophilupop
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Lilupophilupop [message #176517 is a reply to message #176514] Sun, 08 January 2012 22:38 Go to previous message
Jerry Stuckle is currently offline  Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
Senior Member
On 1/8/2012 4:59 PM, Gregor Kofler wrote:
> Am 2012-01-08 21:49, Jerry Stuckle meinte:
>
>>> I can't see any difference to 3GLs. Take the mentioned CF. It allows to
>>> define the data type of supplied arguments for function calls. It allows
>>> intrinsic escaping of query strings. Both features *can* (and should) be
>>> used, but it's not obligatory (and they are not "enabled" by some
>>> default setting). Not doing can and will lead to injections. It's more
>>> or less the same thing as with PHP.
>>>
>>
>> First of all, please study up on what a 3GL language is and what a 4GL
>> language is (I won't get into it here - it's off topic in this newsgroup).
>
> LOL. Yes, I can ready the Wikipedia article. From the list there, I know
> and have worked with Clipper, ColdFusion and Mathematica. (And
> ColdFusion in particular urges for a comparison to PHP.)
>
> BTW: the *German* Wikipedia article states that
> "The term 4GL cannot be exactly defined and is used mainly for marketing
> purposes".
>
>>>> And even with a CMS you have to write your own scripts.
>>>
>>> Pardon? You can, but you don't have to. No need to write scripts with
>>> WordPress, Joomla!, Typo3, ...
>
>> I've used WordPress, Joomla and Drupal. In every one of them I've ended
>> up writing code for my client because the plugins don't do what he wants.
>
> So? As I said: you can, but you don't have to. And even then, one (well,
> perhaps not you) would use the CMS' own functions, classes and
> framework. Besides, I'm pretty sure the *vast* majority of CMS based
> websites out there don't sport any individual code snippets.
>

But even if you're using the CMS's own functions, classes and frameworks
you can have security problems in your own code.

And yes, I'm sure there are sites which don't use anything else. Just
as there are sites which use no server-side programming at all.

I'd like to see where you get your statistics that the "*vast majority
of CMS based websites out there don't support any individual code snippets".

>> Of course, if you just tell the client he can only do what the addons
>> allow, that's one thing. I prefer to satisfy the client's needs.
>
> You are every PHP developer's hero. I'd have never thought of that...
>
> Gregor


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Running function in the background?
Next Topic: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious?
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Fri Sep 27 14:19:28 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04759 seconds