FUDforum: comp.lang.php » Dynamic form generation

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » Dynamic form generation

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: Dynamic form generation [message #177723 is a reply to message #177685]

Tue, 17 April 2012 12:49

Thomas 'PointedEars'
Messages: 701
Registered: October 2010

Karma:

Senior Member

Denis McMahon wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:59:52 +0100, Tony Marston wrote:
>> If you used a proper framework ...
>
> ... then you'd have all the junk and baggage that comes along with that
> framework, including any security flaws in the framework.
>
> Not saying that frameworks are inherently bad, but they're not
> automatically the solution either.

TINSTAAFL. If you want complete flexibility of the application as the OP
wants, you have to have an abstraction layer in your application, i.e. it
has to be built on a framework (some people really should reflect on the
term "framework" and its etymology). Abstraction layers come at a price:
Increased overall complexity of the application and decreased efficiency for
tasks that do not require as much flexibility.

Whether that framework was written by you or someone else is another matter.
Chances are that a framework written by someone else has already gained
enough adoption in the global software community that its flaws – including
security flaws – are more quickly detected and fixed than in a framework
that you have written yourself. On the other hand, chances are that a
framework you have written yourself can be better adjusted *by you* to do
what you want than a framework written by someone else, especially if you
created it for the same project in which you are using it.

Inevitably all frameworks become bloated if functionality for flexibility
keeps being added to them. It would appear that there is a point where a
framework author should stop improving it and start something new for a new
project, maybe based on old code (but sometimes a rewrite is less expensive
and turns out to be better). IOW, it is a good idea if you built frameworks
with modularity in mind and use them only *as needed* (not simply for the
sake of using them, like trying to appear cool to the crowd).

PointedEars
--
realism: HTML 4.01 Strict
evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict
madness: XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml
-- Bjoern Hoehrmann

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Dynamic form generation By: Charles on Thu, 12 April 2012 03:48
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Thu, 12 April 2012 04:03
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: The Natural Philosoph on Thu, 12 April 2012 04:46
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Michael Vilain on Thu, 12 April 2012 04:52
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Denis McMahon on Thu, 12 April 2012 12:42
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Charles on Fri, 13 April 2012 03:43
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Michael Vilain on Fri, 13 April 2012 04:55
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Denis McMahon on Fri, 13 April 2012 13:19
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Fri, 13 April 2012 08:59
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Denis McMahon on Fri, 13 April 2012 13:22
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Tue, 17 April 2012 12:49
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 17 April 2012 15:36
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Wed, 18 April 2012 08:33
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 18 April 2012 11:59
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Thu, 19 April 2012 08:56
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Thu, 19 April 2012 12:29
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Fri, 20 April 2012 08:27
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Fri, 20 April 2012 11:47
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Sat, 21 April 2012 11:22
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 21 April 2012 14:19
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Sun, 22 April 2012 10:45
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 22 April 2012 14:09
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Tue, 24 April 2012 17:21
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Tue, 24 April 2012 18:56
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Wed, 25 April 2012 08:23
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 24 April 2012 20:20
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Wed, 25 April 2012 09:04
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 25 April 2012 12:29
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Thu, 26 April 2012 11:45
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 22 April 2012 17:21
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Mon, 23 April 2012 12:50
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Tue, 24 April 2012 09:10
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Tue, 24 April 2012 16:11
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Tue, 24 April 2012 16:54
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Tue, 24 April 2012 17:55
		[OT] Was: Dynamic form generation By: Erwin Moller on Wed, 25 April 2012 11:22
		Re: [OT] Was: Dynamic form generation By: The Natural Philosoph on Wed, 25 April 2012 11:46
		Re: [OT] Was: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Thu, 26 April 2012 11:51
		Re: [OT] Was: Dynamic form generation By: Erwin Moller on Fri, 27 April 2012 08:26
		[OT] Yes-or-no questions (was: [OT] Was: Dynamic form generation) By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sat, 28 April 2012 05:56
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Peter H. Coffin on Sat, 14 April 2012 13:53
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Sun, 15 April 2012 07:33
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 15 April 2012 12:51
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Mon, 16 April 2012 08:31
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 16 April 2012 12:33
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Mon, 16 April 2012 14:11
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 16 April 2012 15:18
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Tue, 17 April 2012 08:18
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 17 April 2012 10:07
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Wed, 18 April 2012 08:10
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 18 April 2012 12:09
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Thu, 19 April 2012 08:27
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Thu, 19 April 2012 12:41
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Fri, 20 April 2012 09:10
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Fri, 20 April 2012 12:09
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Sat, 21 April 2012 09:35
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 21 April 2012 10:21
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Sun, 22 April 2012 09:27
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 22 April 2012 14:43
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Mon, 23 April 2012 14:23
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 23 April 2012 16:24
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Thu, 26 April 2012 16:29
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: The Natural Philosoph on Mon, 23 April 2012 19:37
		What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: Tony Marston on Mon, 23 April 2012 13:10
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: Paul Herber on Mon, 23 April 2012 13:22
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: M. Strobel on Mon, 23 April 2012 13:27
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 23 April 2012 13:33
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: Tony Marston on Mon, 23 April 2012 14:26
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 23 April 2012 16:25
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: Luuk on Mon, 23 April 2012 17:45
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: The Natural Philosoph on Mon, 23 April 2012 19:35
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Tue, 24 April 2012 17:45
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: Tony Marston on Sat, 28 April 2012 07:48
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: The Natural Philosoph on Sat, 28 April 2012 08:23
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 28 April 2012 12:37
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sat, 28 April 2012 12:46
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: The Natural Philosoph on Mon, 23 April 2012 19:31
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: Ross McKay on Tue, 24 April 2012 02:32
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: Tim Streater on Tue, 24 April 2012 18:32
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: Ross McKay on Wed, 25 April 2012 09:02
		Re: What Jerry Stuckle thinks of PHP programmers By: The Natural Philosoph on Wed, 25 April 2012 11:20
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 22 April 2012 21:59
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Mon, 23 April 2012 13:05
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 23 April 2012 13:35
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Mon, 23 April 2012 13:41
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: The Natural Philosoph on Mon, 23 April 2012 19:39
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 23 April 2012 13:47
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Wed, 25 April 2012 07:52
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 25 April 2012 12:34
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Fri, 27 April 2012 08:52
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Fri, 27 April 2012 13:16
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Tony Marston on Thu, 12 April 2012 09:52
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Erwin Moller on Fri, 13 April 2012 09:39
		Re: Dynamic form generation By: Jonathan Stein on Fri, 13 April 2012 13:27

Previous Topic:	Data injection problems
Next Topic:	Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Fri Nov 22 20:07:33 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05066 seconds