FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP [message #178105 is a reply to message #178099] Mon, 14 May 2012 07:51 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Shake is currently offline  Shake
Messages: 40
Registered: May 2012
Karma:
Member
El 14/05/2012 5:26, Peter H. Coffin escribió:
> On Sun, 13 May 2012 18:54:01 +0200, Shake wrote:
>
>> Jerry Stuckle a expos? le 13/05/2012 :
>>
>>> You aren't making any sense. Why would it take a server which is
>>> doing more important things LESS time and resources to do the same
>>> job as another machine not doing anything.
>>
>> This means you have to have two machines. At least.
>
> Yes. Of course. That's what real websites do.

I was talking about the "server" like an entity, not entering on how
these one is "phisicaly".

For example the website I put as example, have two balanced front-ends
with php and apache, and two other machines with mysql, sphinx and a few
other servers. Images are on Amazon S3, and also we used (use) some ec2
machines.

But for me all this stuff is "the server". And to batch the image
scalating we are talking about using another "machine". For example the
machines for developers, or testing. They, of course, ar not powerful
machines. Don't need to be.

And I put numbers, about 266.000 page views per day. I am talking about
a real case. Not teorethical. And we tried both methods, batching and
on-the-fly.

And the result is: On the fly is more flexible, more quick to put on
production new sizes. And it have to be used when images are not so big.

If we have to scale the originals to a big size, on the fly could be a
big problem. The true is that always is a problem in any manner when you
have to scale to big sizes.

But when you need a new little image size, and you can use the nearest
bigger scaled image, process is quick enough to do on-the-fly without
penalizing speed, or overload on the server.

Greetings
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: is_dir true from cli, false from Apache
Next Topic: in_array performance in unsorted vs sorted array
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Tue Nov 26 19:38:07 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04631 seconds