| Re: How expensive is glob'ing a dir and including all the files? [message #179146 is a reply to message #179145] |
Sat, 15 September 2012 01:45   |
Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 9/14/2012 7:43 PM, Michael Fesser wrote:
> .oO(Jerry Stuckle)
>
>> On 9/14/2012 6:24 PM, J. Frank Parnell wrote:
>>
>>> When I do properties locally, on Win, it says size: 408KB, size on disc:
>>> 720KB. Compared to the wordpress 'includes' dir at 5Megs, doesnt seem
>>> like much, although i'm not sure if wp includes that whole dir, always.
>>> Would it be more efficient to concatenate my include files?
>>
>> As others have said - include only what you need. The time consuming
>> part is parsing the PHP code, not reading one or more files.
>> Concatenating will still require PHP to parse the code.
>
> Sure, but it makes a difference if you include a hundred files, each
> with a single function, or if you just include a single file containing
> all those functions.
>
> It would make sense to group all the functions into semantic units and
> put these into single files or classes. Then include the units you need.
>
> Micha
>
Not that much difference. The majority of the time is in the parsing,
not reading the files, especially since the files will most probably
already be in buffers.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================
|
|
|
|
Calendar
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
]