| Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android [message #181163 is a reply to message #181160] |
Fri, 19 April 2013 20:22   |
Arno Welzel
Messages: 317
Registered: October 2011
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Jerry Stuckle, 2013-04-19 22:06:
> On 4/19/2013 4:02 PM, Arno Welzel wrote:
>> Arno Welzel, 2013-04-19 22:00:
>>
>>> Jerry Stuckle, 2013-04-19 18:44:
>>>
>>>> On 4/19/2013 11:14 AM, Arno Welzel wrote:
>>>> > Am 19.04.2013 14:09, schrieb Jerry Stuckle:
>>>> >
>>>> >> On 4/19/2013 3:30 AM, Arno Welzel wrote:
>>>> >>> Jerry Stuckle, 2013-04-15 04:05:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> On 4/14/2013 10:33 AM, Luuk wrote:
>>>> >>>>> On 14-04-2013 14:48, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> >>>>>> On 4/14/2013 3:46 AM, 23alagmy wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>> Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> http://iamaspammer.com
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> What does this have to do with PHP, SPAMMER?
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> WHY is this message to comp.lang.php, comlaining that someone is
>>>> >>>>> spamming here? The sender of this spammed message probably will not read
>>>> >>>>> it anywayz........
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Maybe, maybe not.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> But ignoring SPAM does not make it go away.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> *Nothing* makes spam go away except filtering it.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Your proof?
>>>> >
>>>> > Nothing will keep spammers from trying to send their stuff.
>>>> >
>>>> > So filtering (or better rejecting) spam is the only reasonable solution
>>>> > to avoid it.
>>>> >
>>>> > What's your proof, that spammers will stop, just because you tell them
>>>> > you don't want their spam? How many spammers could you convince to stop
>>>> > it by responding to their spam?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Your proof?
>>>
>>> Spam exists.
>>>
>>>> You made the claim that nothing will stop the spammers. The only claim
>>>> I made was that ignoring it will not stop the spammers.
>>>
>>> So what?
>>>
>>>> So what's your proof?
>>>>
>>>> And yes, I have gotten spammers websites and email accounts terminated.
>>>> Plus, if you've paid ANY attention, some spammers come back here and
>>>> apologize for spamming.
>>>
>>> Then those people where not spammers - otherwise the would have apologized.
>>
>> Sorry - sent to early and typing to fast...
>>
>> So those people where not spammers - otherwise they would not have
>> apologized since spammers *never* apologize to send spam.
>>
>>
>
> Maybe *YOU* don't apologize for sending SPAM. Some people do, when they
> realize it IS spam.
Then they are not spammers. They are just people who did a mistake.
> A spammer is a person who sends spam - not some subset like you want to
> make them. When the error of their ways is pointed out, some people
> correct those errors.
No - a "spammer" is a person who sends spam and does not care about the
negative effects.
> But then you have a VERY narrow view of who spammers are. One which is
> NOT shared by most of the world.
The opposite is true - otherwise everybody would kindly ask every
spammer to stop their business instead of using tools like
SpamAssassing, greylisting, blacklisting etc.
--
Arno Welzel
http://arnowelzel.de
http://de-rec-fahrrad.de
|
|
|
|
Calendar
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
]