Re: calling a value into another php script... [message #182743 is a reply to message #182742] |
Sun, 01 September 2013 19:09 |
Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598 Registered: September 2010
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 9/1/2013 2:23 PM, Christoph Michael Becker wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
>> On 8/30/2013 8:33 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>
>>> Not my posting. Please learn to reply to the appropriate person when
>>> commenting posts.
>
> Indeed, you didn't post this attribution line, but it was quoted this
> way in the post I was replying to.
>
>>> BTW - I don't think it was meant to be either helpful or funny - but it
>>> is accurate.
>
>> My apologies - I read back through this thread and realized you don't
>> have the background of the previous discussions Pointed Head is talking
>> about.
>
> If you're referring to older discussions (say about a year back, or
> longer), indeed, I don't have the background.
>
>> He has propounded that buffering in the script (generally using the
>> ob_xxx() calls) is more efficient than outputting the data directly.
>>
>> It has nothing to do with the PHP buffering, which I agree is handled
>> well (like I said in my first response to him).
>
> There still seems to be a misunderstanding. In *this* thread Thomas was
> referring to PHP's output_buffering, not to the ob_*() functions.
>
No, if you were familiar with Pointed Head's previous postings, he was
referring to buffering in the script - not PHP buffering - using
ob_xxx() functions or even putting everything into a string.
He doesn't even know about PHP buffering - although he will claim to the
end of the world he wrote code that does it.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================
|
|
|