| Re: Forum Benchmark [message #359 is a reply to message #357] |
Fri, 08 February 2002 01:13   |
hackie
Messages: 177
Registered: January 2002
Karma:
|
Senior Member
Core Developer |
|
|
| Quote: |
Each bulletin board had the same number of posts, forums and members.
Each bulletin board was populated with the same information, the same data set was converted into the boards native format. mySQL and HTTPD was restarted after the population, and inbetween each bulletin board test.
The bulletin board was then set to run and the average number of pages it rendered was calulated, using the same formula, etc for each test.
By all means, make your own tests but I am confident that Aurora will still come out on top.
There has been much discussion about the validity of the test as Aurora isn't finished. The tests were conducted on the board index, forum listing and topic view pages - all three sections that are complete on Aurora. Infact, there is some optimization still to be performed - so testing the final version will probably be to Auroras advantage.
I'm not trying to start a war here, I'm just clarifying the hear-say.
|
Okie, but as was stated, when you present benchmarks full disclosure is in order, full disclosure involves the hardware benchmarks were run on (this should go into quite detail! Down the version of the network card and driver used for it).
This information should be enough for anyone that anyone desiring to do so CAN replicate your benchmarks to confirm them.
Aurora most certainly didn't provide the required information to allow anyone interested replicate the benchmarks.
cc intelligence.c -o intelligence
$ ./intelligence
Segmentation fault
|
|
|
|
Calendar
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
]