FUDforum: Bug Reports » Different style definitions of tables

Home » FUDforum Development » Bug Reports » Different style definitions of tables

Show: Today's Messages :: Unread Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
| Subscribe to topic | Bookmark topic

Different style definitions of tables [message #1550]

Thu, 18 April 2002 14:46

smike

Messages: 182
Registered: April 2002
Location: Munich/Germany

Karma: 0

Senior Member

add to buddy list
ignore all messages by this user

Have you already noticed, that the style of tables wouldn't be constructed the same way?
I noticed that, as I tried to change the text-color of tableheadings.
The table of the first page looks like that of threads. The table of a category looks different.

Then I looked at the source code of these pages and found the following two entries.

----------------------------


<table border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2" class="ContentTable">
<tr>
<td colspan=3 width="100%" class="TableHeading">Forum</td>
<td class="TableHeading">Posts</td>
<td class="TableHeading">Threads</td>
<td nowrap class="TableHeading">Last Post</td>
<td nowrap class="TableHeading">Moderator(s)</td>
</tr>

----------------------------


<table border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2" class="ContentTable">
<tr class="TableHeading">
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%">Thread</td>
<td width=1>Replies</td>
<td width=1>Views</td>
<td align="center">Rating</td>
<td nowrap>Last Post</td>
<td nowrap>Started On</td>
</tr>

----------------------------

You can see, that the style-class "TableHeading" on the one hand is located in the tabledata-tag and on the other hand in the tablerow-tag.
I'm not sure, whether this is wanted.

I tried to find the appropriate php-files, but didn't succeed.
Oh yes... I use version 1.2.7 of FUD.

Bye, Mike

Report message to a moderator

Rate author: +1 -1

Re: Different style definitions of tables [message #1559 is a reply to message #1550]

Thu, 18 April 2002 15:11

Ilia

Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002

Karma: 0

Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer

add to buddy list
ignore all messages by this user

The 2nd code you've pasted is a better aproach, but both codes will end up with the same result as far as the browser is concerned.

FUDforum Core Developer

Report message to a moderator

Rate author: +1 -1

Re: Different style definitions of tables [message #1565 is a reply to message #1559]

Thu, 18 April 2002 15:54

smike

Messages: 182
Registered: April 2002
Location: Munich/Germany

Karma: 0

Senior Member

add to buddy list
ignore all messages by this user

prottoss wrote on Thu, 18 April 2002 3:11 PM

The 2nd code you've pasted is a better aproach, but both codes will end up with the same result as far as the browser is concerned.

I'm sorry but it wouldn't at Mozilla 0.9.9 and at Konqueror 3.0. Perhaps you have misunderstood me, but the code I posted previously wasn't created by me, but by FUD. I just copied it!
I add two little screenshots to this post.
Bye, Mike

Attachment: forum1.jpg
(Size: 6.57KB, Downloaded 588 times)
Attachment: forum2.jpg
(Size: 5.36KB, Downloaded 600 times)

Report message to a moderator

Rate author: +1 -1

Re: Different style definitions of tables [message #1567 is a reply to message #1565]

Thu, 18 April 2002 16:33

Ilia

Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002

Karma: 0

Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer

add to buddy list
ignore all messages by this user

Okie I see your point I'll take a look into the prob.

FUDforum Core Developer

Report message to a moderator

Rate author: +1 -1

Re: Different style definitions of tables [message #1912 is a reply to message #1567]

Wed, 24 April 2002 15:28

smike

Messages: 182
Registered: April 2002
Location: Munich/Germany

Karma: 0

Senior Member

add to buddy list
ignore all messages by this user

Have you taken a look at the members page of the FUDforum?
At top of the member table you can see the mentioned different styles. (Mozilla 0.9.9; Konqueror 3.0)
BTW, I know you can sort the rows, but the class in the source-code is the same as in my first post.
Bye, Mike

[Updated on: Wed, 24 April 2002 15:30]

Report message to a moderator

Rate author: +1 -1